This from Dan Froomkin's Wash Post column, White House Briefing:
"In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, 'write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?' Wallace's answer to those questions was published in the Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan. See how much you think his statements apply to our society today:
'The really dangerous American fascist,' Wallace wrote, '. . . is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.'
"In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism he saw rising in America, Wallace added, 'They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.' "
There is a conventional wisdom developing whereby many of us seem to yearn for a strong personality to point us in the right direction and tell us what to do. Democracy is painful and requires much of its adhereants. It certainly seems easier when we're given something to be afraid of and told who to blame for that fear, but I'm not so sure that idea leads ultimately to the best end.
What's the old saying, "The hard thing to do and the right thing to do are, more often than not, the same thing." Now, I would say it's much more difficult to accept the limitations of our governing system, imperfect as it is, because it's better than the alternative. Others would say that these unique times are forcing some real difficult choices upon us, especially when it comes to civil liberties.
What do you think?
"In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, 'write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?' Wallace's answer to those questions was published in the Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan. See how much you think his statements apply to our society today:
'The really dangerous American fascist,' Wallace wrote, '. . . is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.'
"In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism he saw rising in America, Wallace added, 'They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.' "
There is a conventional wisdom developing whereby many of us seem to yearn for a strong personality to point us in the right direction and tell us what to do. Democracy is painful and requires much of its adhereants. It certainly seems easier when we're given something to be afraid of and told who to blame for that fear, but I'm not so sure that idea leads ultimately to the best end.
What's the old saying, "The hard thing to do and the right thing to do are, more often than not, the same thing." Now, I would say it's much more difficult to accept the limitations of our governing system, imperfect as it is, because it's better than the alternative. Others would say that these unique times are forcing some real difficult choices upon us, especially when it comes to civil liberties.
What do you think?
posted by McDizzle at 3/10/2006 01:39:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home